We repeatedly hear questions on this board from one side of the triad or the other about people not maintaining or even exploiting the concept/promises of "open" adoption – APs promising contact and then shutting out the FPs, FPs not responding to invitations, correspondance or requests, one party or another using the situation for personal gain, etc.
My question is, if agencies are supposed to be "matching" people (or providing profiles of the of the other possible party for "choices" based on minimal "preference" questions) why is this such a frequent problem?
I think it is partly due to the fact that these agencies make their "matches" on superficial things like ethnicity, education levels, etc. rather than on any sort of personality based method. I wonder if there would be more successful "open" adoptions if these "matches" were based more on something like personality or psychological testing.
I also wonder if agencies were more active in encouraging "bonding" between families if the "success" rates would improve.
BTW, I am AGAINST "pre-birth matching" in general, I was just pondering this issue due to some of today’s Qs and was wondering what other people’s thoughts and experiences were on/with the subject.
Thanks for sharing your thoughts.
To clarify, I am asking what you think are possible causes for the low "success rate" of "open" adoptions (meaning adoptions where on going contact is promised) when agencies are supposedly "matching" people who intend on having a long term relationship.
I DO NOT mean that the things that people are currently "matched" on are not necessary considerations. I am saying that I think a DEEPER look at compatibility should be made. If dating services and employers can make the effort, why can’t, shouldn’t Adoption Agencies?
NOR am I saying that it would give any guarantees. I am WELL aware people LIE about things and circumstances change (as I have mentioned here often). I am trying to gather ideas for ways of possibly IMPROVING the system.
Thanks.
Loserguurl:
"WHY is this about PAP’s keeping the adoption open ONLY? There are plenty-*MANY*-situations where the natural parents just disappear."
Where did I say ANY of that? I asked about agency responsibility – NOT the FPs OR APs. Please RE-READ the question.
Thank to the people who actually read and answered the question!
I’m gathering that most people feel public agencies handle the "matching" process better than private agencies. I agree – although it is more about the kids being matched than the two sets parents. (As it should be – especially with older children!) Why is this level of care not expected from private agencies? Considering the fees involved…they can certainly afford it. If adoption is supposed to be in the best interest of a child is it not in their best interest to be placed in the best and most copacetic situation regarding all their parents? (I am not talking about TPR situations.)
Thank to the people who actually read and answered the question!
I’m gathering that most people feel public agencies handle the "matching" process better than private agencies. I agree – although it is more about the kids being matched than the two sets parents. (As it should be – especially with older children!) Why is this level of care not expected from private agencies? Considering the fees involved…they can certainly afford it. If adoption is supposed to be in the best interest of a child is it not in their best interest to be placed in the best and most copacetic situation regarding all their parents? (I am not talking about TPR situations.)
Holy shit! Adoption agencies just give children away to the highest bidder, unless it is from foster care where they give them away to anyone who qualifies on there standards.
My friend was an adoption agency baby, the kind people pay 30,000 for. So, she got these parents who do not care about her at all. They just use her for show and so their friends will think they are saints. She ran away four times since these people are terrible and went into foster care because she proved that they were incompetent and just got adopted last year at the age of 11.
I was given old parents, which isn’t that bad, but they don’t understand me. They believe I invent my life and that everything is fake. They are those old people who believe tampons take away your virginity. OMG! They believe that I cause my bullying issues at school, and believe me I try to run away from it. They love me though, they are happy when I succeed and they only want the best for me, so I got a pretty good match.
I think Open Adoption should be enforced. They do terrible matching at all agencies. Who to give the baby too, which parents go together.
My parents tend to talk trash against my bio mom. Which never seeks to amaze me. Plus it was one of those out of state adoption things where they never got to meet them. Apparently I have received two letters since I was born, but then she dropped all contact and my mom can’t find her. Yeah right! What a load of BS.
For parent to parent matching, why don’t they simply just find two people who share an effing interest, not monetary status or a friggin education level. I mean seriously people!
-Tempe